Cholesterol: The Missing Information

October 29, 2005 at 5:04 pm 1 comment

Millions of people rely on various websites for accurate, sound information. One such site is About.com which recently released an online guide, How to Lower Blood Cholesterol. For anyone interested, About.com is a New York Times company. On their main website, New York Times Company: Our Company, they state that the “core purpose is to enhance society by creating, collecting and distributing high-quality news, information and entertainment.”

The article in question left me wondering, where exactly was the “high-quality” aspect to the information presented? The highly visible banner at the top of the page encouraged readers to “learn more” about Vytorin, a statin drug, while the information itself was scant and offered little options to dietary intervention, with only the AHA Step 2 Diet suggested before starting stain drug therapy.

A review of the evidence shows that other dietary approaches may actually be more effective to not only lower total cholesterol, but to improve cholesterol ratios of HDL, LDL and triglycerides. It is the ratio of these components of total cholesterol that are much more important to weighing risk than total cholesterol alone or any one single component of your cholesterol panel viewed in isolation! Yet, nowhere in the article is such detail provided.

Statins are indeed effective, but they do carry some significant risks – risks that can be avoided if one explores other options and tries these other options before throwing their hands up in the air after just one dietary approach that doesn’t work for them. Specifically – a controlled-carb approach!

A diet that restricts carbohydrate intake has been shown to be highly effective with cholesterol improvements in the majority (70-90%) who can maintain a controlled-carb lifestyle. Such an approach isn’t for everyone – there does exist a small population of people who are “responders” and will see no benefit from carbohydrate restriction. But, if you work with your doctor, it is worth the effort to see if this alternative dietary approach is appropriate for you.

The article should have noted the data that shows controlling carbohydrate is an effective approach – but I can only conclude that such information was missing because the section about cholesterol is sponsored by a pharmaceutical company. Every last page I clicked on throughout the section kept coming up with banners to Vytorin – learn more, learn more, learn more – about Vytorin! Maybe About.com needs to change their name to AboutVytorin.com!

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Uncategorized.

Where’s the Real Food? PBS: Rx for Survival

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Anonymous  |  December 24, 2007 at 4:22 pm

    Fantastic comments, thanks! I tend to question my doc (a lot) when a new script is recommended to quickly. Sure I want to live longer –but I’m currently on a med that if I’d been told more 20+years ago, I probably wouldn’t have started it. I wonder what my heart health would be like today if lifestyle changes had been preached more strongly. The change in my bathroom habits due to 3 months of Vytorin is hardly worth the fantastic readings. Since I view medicine as a ‘practice’, I must be allowed to interact and thus seek feedback to prepare my next discussion. Again, thanks much.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


October 2005
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Feeds


%d bloggers like this: